top of page
Copy of Kopi av KRYPTO LABS.png

Deconstructing the Howey Test: Examining the SEC's Approach to Regulating Digital Assets



The Howey Test is a tool used by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to determine whether a particular investment constitutes a security. It was named after a Supreme Court case in 1946, SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., in which the Court established the criteria for determining whether an investment is a security. The test has four criteria that must be met for an investment to be considered a security: an investment of money, a common enterprise, an expectation of profits, and profits generated by the efforts of a promoter or third party. If all four criteria are met, the SEC considers the investment a security and it must be registered with the SEC and comply with federal securities laws.

But, as the financial landscape and investment opportunities have evolved significantly since the Howey Test was first established, it's important to recognize that the test may not be well-suited for evaluating newer forms of investments such as digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies. This is because it's criteria are quite broad and can be easily circumvented. The criteria that an investment is in a common enterprise, and that profits are generated from the efforts of a promoter or third party, can be interpreted in different ways and can be met in different ways as well. This means that the Howey Test may not capture all the characteristics of digital assets, just like how we can't classify a new species of animal based on its physical characteristics alone, without understanding its behavior or ecology.

Many digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, have a decentralized structure, making it difficult to apply the Howey Test's criteria. For example, the SEC's former Director of Corporate Finance, William Hinman, stated in 2018 that based on his understanding of the Ethereum network's decentralized structure, Ethereum offerings and its associated sales would not be considered securities transactions. However, the debate about whether Ethereum can be labeled a security reemerged following the network's switch to a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, which greatly changed how the blockchain functions.

This highlights the need for a transparent regulatory framework for digital assets that takes into account their unique characteristics and risks. Such a framework would provide clear guidelines and rules for digital asset issuers and investors to follow, ensuring that investors are protected and that the digital asset industry can continue to evolve in a safe and legal environment. The SEC should be responsible for issuing clear guidance on the regulatory requirements for digital assets and regularly reviewing and updating it as necessary.


Comments


bottom of page